Welcome to Reliberation Sign in | Help
in
Latest Most Popular Active Watch List Amigos  
Real Estate Magic!

Risk Reduction 101

By: Candice A Donofrio
Saturday, January 26, 2008 9:35 AM

To Arizona real estate brokers, Bob Bass is a good guy.

He's an Arizona real estate attorney who defends brokers. If you've had the opportunity to sit in on one of his classes, he instructs us on how to protect ourselves and our clients via applied risk reduction techniques.

(That's right. We protect our clients, we are all safer.)  Here are some of the risk reduction techniques I've employed:

Start off with client selection. This is entirely manageable from our end. If you feel 'off' about a prospective client, ask more questions before you agree to do business with them. This is a critical time to make a good business decision that could have far reaching implications in either direction. And it's a lot easier to do early than late.

Here are some of my red flags where prospectives are concerned: As Jeff Foxworthy would say, "They might be a problem if . . ." :

They badmouth agents.
They are not willing to talk to a lender or show their source of funds.
They brag about suing, having sued or being willing to sue people.
They indicate they know more than you do about your business.
They declare 'their business' none of yours.

Please feel free to add your red flags if you wish! :)

To avoid misrepresentation, which is the most often-named in claims against brokers, be the provider of sources of information, not the source itself. Anything you pass along to consumers needs to be factual, which is a 'duh' but checking and double checking is a good practice. Every property is unique. It is feasible that one lot in a subdivision may require different utilities or have different zoning, even than the one across the street! Do your homework and pass the findings--with where from, who you talked to and their contact info--along to your client.

Learn to edit your e-mail communications and especially text messages.  We zip those puppies off at stop lights or between meetings and sometimes in the midst of distractions. That won't excuse us should those words be recorded by you client (and they can be!) if they are ambiguous or misleading (and they can be!).

Remember:

Your words do not recede into the past after you hit the 'send' button. They advance into the future. Make sure it is not to haunt you. :)

Negligent referrals are a concern, We are all networking and our reach is very wide. Make sure it is clear to your client that you are suggesting, not endorsing. Advise your clients that they can search for an expert on their own and provide some search points to start from.

Failure to disclose is another hot spot for liability. If you are in doubt, talk to your broker. But the general rule is if you wonder if you should disclose, you probably should.  :) Document disclosure and confirmation that your recipient received it.

Another really sticky issue is 'how much you should help as opposed to the client doing for themself' which goes to fiduciary duty but is also a huge liability risk. We are conditioned to be helpful and indeed, that is our greatest skill in this business. But the moment we begin doing for our client without their participation, we are on a slippery slope.

But we work with busy people who rely on us to keep it together, and THAT is our duty as well. How to do it all safely?

Whatever you are doing on behalf of your client or as part of a transaction, DOCUMENT it and ADVISE your client in writing. Get their acknowledgement in writing or document the date and time of your efforts. Track your e-mails and stay organized.

Use the 123 rule: Tell your client what you're gonna do--do it--then tell your client you did it.

Keep the time and date stamp on your computer accurate. Make sure you're in the right time zone (I know, another 'duh' but computers can get amnesia after an error or system restore. Be aware of what's going on in that lower left hand corner of your desktop. :)

Home Warranty.
Home Inspection.
Survey
.

Three of the best risk reduction applications of all!

 

 

<< Read More at Reliberation.com

Comments

Mike Farmer
Member Since '03

Mike Farmer said:

Thanks, Candice. Three years ago I had a client thatstarted out "bad mouthing", then told me about a couple of law suits against agents. I should have dropped him. He wound up threatening to sue me after I sold two of his properties and gave him a reduction in commission.

It turned out my lawyer stood up to his baseless threats and it went away, but, yes, heed the warning signs!

January 27, 2008 12:07 PM
Cyd  Weeks
Member Since '05

Cyd Weeks said:

I can not say enough about the blessings of email.  It's gotten me out of a few situations and won me a procuring cause hearing.   I save all of my emails (what a file that is!) and when I have a conversation with one of my customers about important things I recap it all in an email and send it out.  

I had one customer talking to me about lawsuits and I didn't take him on.  Just makes sense that sue happy people, while happy with you now, will find something not to be happy about and try to sue you.  

Great post Candice!

January 27, 2008 12:59 PM
Lloyd LaTour
Member Since '07

Lloyd LaTour said:

This is from thee www.todayshow.com

 Homeowner sues agent

Jan. 25: A San Diego woman claims that her real estate agent led her and her husband to overpay for their home.

Today Show Home

By Mike Celizic

TODAYShow.com contributor

updated 10:35 a.m. ET, Fri., Jan. 25, 2008

Given the American obsession with litigation, it’s somewhat amazing that legal experts could not recall a case of a home buyer who may have overpaid suing a real estate agent before Marty Ummel came along.

Legal and real estate experts say that Ummel and her husband, Vernon Ummel, should have done their homework better before purchasing their four-bedroom home in a luxury development outside of San Diego in 2005 for $1.2 million, a price that the Ummels say was as much as $175,000 more than what similar houses in the development sold for.

They contend it was not their fault.

Story continues below ↓

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

advertisement

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“We hired our agent because he was a real estate professional,” Marty Ummel told TODAY’s Ann Curry on Friday in New York. “He was expected to do his due diligence. And they have a code of ethics where they have to put the buyers first. I think he just wanted to go ahead and make his commission.”

Looking toward retirement, the Ummels sold their home in San Francisco and moved to the San Diego area to be nearer to their children. Marty Ummel, 60, is a fundraiser for California State University; Vernon Ummel, 71, is an administrator at Dominican University.

“We worked hard and to think we’d done that all of our lives, and then for a Realtor not to tell us about the biggest purchase of our lives that there was a house selling for much less,” Marty Ummel said.

Legal experts say that the Ummels’ case may be the first of many as homeowners react to the crash in the housing market that has left many people with mortgages that are greater than the value of their houses.

MSNBC legal analyst Susan Filan told Curry that she doesn’t think the Ummels will prevail in court.

“I don’t think it’s a suit that has merit,” she said. “I think the standard of proof will be that this agent willfully, deliberately and with malicious intent withheld this information. This information that was allegedly withheld is public information. The bank wouldn’t have given them the mortgage in the amount they got if the appraisal didn’t back the house.”

“We feel the appraisal was manipulated,” Marty Ummel responded.

In her lawsuit, which is to go to trial in March, she says that the agent did not meet requests to give them a written appraisal until after the deal had gone through, telling them orally that the value of the house was the $1.2 million they paid for it.

She said the agent was negligent in not telling them about other houses that sold for less, including one three doors away that has a pool and sold for $105,000 less and another that was considerably bigger that sold for $175,000 less.

“You can’t just say, ‘Oh, it’s the same size. It’s the same value.’ What’s the nature of the interior? Maybe it was painted all black,” Filan said. “You can’t just look at little boxes on a map and say that one should be the same value as that one.”

Marty Ummel said that there are just 26 homes in their subdivision and all were constructed by the same builder and all are similar.

“This was a tract home. All of the homes were built at approximately the same time,” she said.

Buyer beware

The defendant in the suit is essentially claiming caveat emptor — let the buyer beware. In a legal brief, the defendant quotes a real estate authority as saying the Ummels “simply didn’t do what is expected of a knowledgeable and sophisticated buyer, and are looking for someone other than themselves to take responsibility.”

“The value of something is what someone’s willing to sell it for and what someone’s willing to pay for it,” Filan said. “Some of those houses may have gone for less than yours because the seller was so motivated, they didn’t want the same amount that your seller did. Maybe they were going through a divorce and wanted to give their spouse less.”

According to The New York Times, the Ummels have already invested $75,000 in their suit. They are asking for $105,000 — the difference between what they paid and what they feel the house was actually worth — plus their legal fees.

Vernon Ummel had no particular desire to pursue the matter, but his wife, who picketed the agent before filing her suit, was insistent. “She’s very tenacious,” he said. “Even though she’s 114 pounds, she’s not to be taken lightly.”

For Marty Ummel, it’s about more than their personal grievance.

“There are other attorneys and Realtors who say we have a good case, we’re trailblazers,” she said. “And I think when all the facts come out, that we have a very good chance of winning, and if not, we want to change the industry. We want disclosure.”

More from TODAY  

‘No Country’ claims SAG Awards    |      

Stars put on glitz for the SAG Awards

Ice man plays it very cool for 72 minutes

Cooking schools targeting trans fats

Move over, beer: Grab a great wine at game time

Beware! 15 foods that can fool you

 Images: This week in pictures  |  More photos

© 2007 MSNBC Interactive

Rate this story   Low  High

Current rating: 2.5 by 396 users • View Top Rated stories

January 28, 2008 8:08 AM
Lloyd LaTour
Member Since '07

Lloyd LaTour said:

sorry I should of read down further it was already a posted subject

January 28, 2008 8:18 AM
Candice A Donofrio
Member Since '07

Candice A Donofrio said:

That's okay Lloyd. We all need to be aware of the potential liabilities and reduce risk.

I just sent out a memo this AM to my agents that I want (to be a little control freak and) to be notified of ANY listings they are about to take that are overpriced by more than 10% of the closest fresh comps.

If buyers could sue us for overpaying, sellers could also sue us for overpricing if it results in no sale ("wahhh, my agent didn't tell me it wouldn't sell at that price") The mother of all 'duhs' but get it in writing. Plus it's an ethics issue (misleading as to value) so I want them all putting in the listing docs that the seller was advised their price is inflated by x% of the comps -- and getting them to sign off.

Better still, do what Bill Thompson does and redo the comps monthly. Smart practice!

Also, Cyd . . . this was brought up in my class this weekend   . . . what I do with e-mail communications is, if the communique is directly material in the transaction, print the hard copy and place in file.

All the communications pertinent to that transaction, either burn to a disc and place in file, or save to a memory stick AND PASSWORD PROTECT IT to prevent the wrong eyes from seeing it. (Tip from a student--smart idea!)

I save all ours too and after 8 years, the files are huge.

Also, invest in an external drive to CYA.

January 28, 2008 9:00 AM
Gregory Bain
Member Since '03

Gregory Bain said:

Yep! Those are RED flags. Wouldn't it be neat if we could post the names of those idoit customers that come in to our office and try to pull that crap. The log entry would look something like this:

Mr. & Mrs. Dumbfrick driving a white caddy stopped in today looking for 3 bedroom 2 bath home in xyz price range. Tried to show several good listings, but they claimed to have already seen them. Badmouthed agent Happy at UnderRock Realty. Tried to show them two other good listings but they had already seen them with agent TooStupid at Redpig Realty. Bad mouthed agent and said they were looking for a lawyer. Told them to go see Bob Bass and come back in two weeks when I have an opening to show them homes.

January 28, 2008 9:05 AM
Candice A Donofrio
Member Since '07

Candice A Donofrio said:

LOL! Beautiful!

January 28, 2008 9:10 AM
Candice A Donofrio
Member Since '07

Candice A Donofrio said:

I'd like to add that the majority of the clients we do business with are lovely people with whom we've had great experiences.

Most of my office's clients are repeat clients and many are now personal friends.

Not to scare off anyone with valid concerns. Just to make it clear we are professionals and need to behave as such for the protection of the public and the agents.

January 28, 2008 9:13 AM
Gregory Bain
Member Since '03

Gregory Bain said:

That's true, Candice. I was just talking about the one driving a white cadillac :)

January 28, 2008 9:21 AM

Add a comment

To post a comment you can sign in using a Point2 ID. Sign in.
Don't have a Point2 ID? Join Point2 NLS or post as a guest.

My Blog

Candice A Donofrio
Next Wave Real Estate Investments LLC

Candice A Donofrio
Member Since '07

recent comments
"ok a public service announc..."
Candice A Donofrio
"client confidentiality"
Candice A Donofrio
"negotiating 101 calling all"
Candice A Donofrio
"buy and bail we should talk..."
Candice A Donofrio
"buy and bail we should talk..."
Candice A Donofrio
"buy and bail we should talk..."
Candice A Donofrio
"buy and bail we should talk..."
Candice A Donofrio
"buy and bail we should talk..."
Candice A Donofrio
"hud 1 closing statement buy..."
Candice A Donofrio
"election 2008 where did vel..."
Candice A Donofrio