I read the following in a newsletter issue from a real estate listings (mostly land) site:
<<CORRECTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS
In the last issue, we stated that it was not necessary to have a survey if a property was located within a platted subdivision or town.>>
Platted subdivisions need resurveying on many occasions. People encroach and surveyors make mistakes. And it's not all that rare that bad surveys have been recorded. On entire subdivisions. A client of mine lost 18 ACRES when a new survey was done on his land. Not his fault, just more accurate surveying tools exist now than the last time it was surveyed. And still they can be wrong.
I don't believe a seasoned agent would/should arbitrarily state 'a survey is not necessary' to a client unless perhaps the client was buying a condo! The potential liabilities for selling land are more numerous than with improved properties. If the client can't use the land as intended because of undiscovered material facts prior to ownership, they--and the broker--may be in for a world of hurting!
And on many occasions, improved properties may need a 'stake and flag' to mark the boundaries. 'Specially when the next door neighbor's putting up a new fence or repouring their driveway! :)
I think that with regard to inspections in general, you need it until you determine (via advice by a specialist in that area) that you don't. An experienced agent can help locate the specialists that will help a client discover what is necessary, starting broadly (such as home inspection), then pinpointing areas of concern (such as soil test, environmental studies, roof, radon, mold etc.)
But wow, does bad information get around on the internet! I'm sure the editors of the portal didn't intend for the info to be incorrect. But I'd lay odds that the original writer was not a real estate professional. Probably someone who found the info somewhere else and perpetuated it.
How many times do you think that 'burned buyers' were lulled into a false sense of security by the internet, ignored their broker's advice to further investigate - and later, attempted to blame the broker for the buyer's own negligence? Are you, the agent, documenting those times you advised a client to heed your suggestions, not the nameless, faceless internet?
How many times have you seen completely erroneous information on listing portals?
This past week? :)
Even after it's been corrected, the damage is done.
It's like pee in a pool, you can't get it out. :)