I met with a buyer in April, 2008 - showed properties and wrote an offer on a Short Sale. We know they take time, the buyer was informed to be patient. Five months go by with some emails traded regarding the status of the offer and finally we hear back from the bank in September, 2008. Buyer and seller and seller's lender reach a deal and we need initials from my buyer who states he wants the property.
He wants to see the property "one more time" so we accommodate and he asks me to send comps and give him 24 hours. I provide the comps and give him his 24 hrs.
The following day he calls to tell me the reason for his hesitancy. "I have been working with this other agent and I want you to step aside and let him handle the deal" My reply was initually to explain procuring cause which he said he understood but did not care. He insisted he wanted to be represented by his other agent. So I said sure, that agent could represent you, but he will not get any of my commission...have him call me.
The agent calls and tells me of his wonderful relationship with the buyer which in his mind is more important than procuring cause and offers me a 25% referral on MY DEAL. I lost it! I told him this is unethical and that he could represent the buyer and get paid by the buyer but he would not get any of my commission.
I hang up and 20 minutes later the buyer calls and threatens to walk from the deal if I do not "work it out" with his other agent. Being a pragmatist I decide to call the agent. I told him that i have problems with his ethics in this matter but will offer him a 25% referral for the buyer. He agreed and traded paperwork.
The buyer returned his initialed executed documents and we are pending.
Now I have a plan of action with regard to this closing and the referral but I would love to hear from other experienced agents both in how else it could have been handled as well as what would you do now??