Recently I was working with an investor client who flips properties. We had a 3rd party vendor (foundation repair) come look to provide a quote for the work needed to be done. We never received the quote and then found out that within the following 48hours that the person (or company) made an offer and it was accepted on that same property!!!
I am pretty well convinced at this point to always have a vendor sign a non-compete for each property that we involve their services on... I don't want to lose another sale due to unethical behaviour of a vendor.
Next issue, I have buyer's agents and have never required any non-compete agreements. Some of my competition does require that. My philosophy is that I don't want to create an adversarial relationship at the point I have an agent that wants to leave. Historically I have had a number of agents come back once they realized the 'grass isn't greener'. Note: I control all technology on the team (12 year network engineer)... when an agent decides to leave I have their accounts shut down virtually instantly. I will provide them only with a copy of the data they personally own. I also forward all their email to another buyer's agent...not the agent that has left.
So what do you think:
1. Require non-compete agreements for all 3rd party vendors (including home inspectors)?
2. Require non-compete agreements for buyer's agents?
Thanks!
Parker Byron
Kansas City Real Estate
www.JohnsonCounty.com