I was looking through my ignored April 08 issue of Realtor magazine and came across this "Code of Ethics Fallacy" little article on pg 33. It says "Common misconceptions about NAR's Code of Ethics can lead to unnecessary disputes with fellow practitioners. Example: procuring cause.
Misunderstanding: Showing a property proves procuring cause and entitles you to a commission if your buyer purchases the home.
The REAL story: Procuring cause is a complex issue. You're telling me? Appendix II to Part 10 of the Code and Arbitration Manual gives a basic definition: "the uninterrupted series of casual events which results in the successful transaction."
Is "series" defined as maybe more than one casual event? It is clear the events need to be uninterupted.
I've seen this talked about off and on but never walked away with a very clear idea.
I know that some of you might have actually found a class on this? What are your thoughts. I have a specific scenario I could share, but think actually it would come down to mediation. Can't buyer agency be better nailed down?