Consumers catch on fast...what if there is a shift in the market thinking about the way these rebates work?
I mean, we all know that FSBO tends to signal a "deal" to a potential buyer. We know that radical price drops signal additional willingness to drop more OR problems with the home.
What if "ZIP", with the buyer agent rebates, start to signal to sellers that the seller is getting ripped off. Now, hold on a second...this isn't a rip zip or any of their agent thing, but something that popped into my head when I was thinking how a seller would feel about these rebates and responding to one of our contributors here on RELIB.
A seller is paying $XXX in commissions...the house is set at $XXX,XXX price. HOWEVER, if the seller sees that the co broke is ZIP, they will soon realize that the buyer is getting a "rebate" and they may become more difficult to work with...
It might go something to the effect of, "Well, this is a good offer but since they are with ZIP and getting all that money given back to them, they can afford their own TITLE and/or SURVEY and/or HOME WARRANTY and if they can't, then it's no deal. " "I'm not giving seller contribution because they are getting a rebate check from their agent"
Now, some of you will think this is just a shot at ZIP (or other rebate based companies) but if you really think about the way a seller THINKS a lot of times, isn't this thought process right up the alley?