I have heard (and read on blogs,etc) that any commission or bonus offered over 3% should be given to the buyer so the buyer can get a lower price, etc. and to not do it is unethical. Why? What is so magical about 3%? See, I feel that as long as I do not just choose properties that offer a larger commission or bonus, and allow my buyer to choose to see, and if they choose that property, then I get the bonus or commission. Just like in your job, when at the end of the year, the boss hands out a bonus, you don't turn around and give it to the mailroom clerk. It is your bonus.
Now, don't get me wrong, I am not suggesting someone should something unethical, like push their client to purchase that property. It is their choice. And I especially hate listings that offer a bonus, and then in the agent remarks say, $1000 bonus to selling agent for full price offer". Well, that is crazy, I'm not pushing my client to make a full price on your inducement. That is not doing the best for my client, since I already know you the seller is willing to give up $1000.
I am saying that if my client makes the offer they want, and the offer is accepted, then what makes the 3% so sacred, that anything above should be "rebated" in some form? I say why shouldn't seller be allowed to try to raise their property above the clutter by offering a larger commission or bonus? And why shouldn't I accept it, guilt free, if the negotiations went on unhampered?
Shelly